What will be the impact of the zoning changes on the town? No one can be certain, and this is where the controversy lies. It’s all estimates and projections, some more informed than others. Ultimately real estate investors and developers — and to some degree the Planning Board — will determine whether anything is built at all; whether it’s senior living, condos or apartments, taller or shorter.
Much of the concern about potential impacts depends on whether one expects construction of multifamily housing to start soon and be extensive. Opponents of the more ambitious plan express fears that it will lead to Needham becoming overbuilt and overcrowded. Opponents stress they are not against complying with the MBTA law, it’s “overcompliance” they reject.
Proponents of the plan passed at Town Meeting note the region, the state and indeed much of the country is in the midst of a housing crisis, and there is a sense of urgency to add supply. They cite the need to make multifamily housing a worthy investment for developers. It takes some vision, they say, to allow Needham to evolve.
Here is a brief overview of the core considerations.
| Issue | Con | Pro | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rezoning helps address state and regional housing shortage | Minimum compliance could be enough for Needham to do its part. Rushing to overcompliance may add more units than the town can handle. | It’s important for towns like Needham to step up for the region and the state as a whole, but there’s a lot in this for Needham as well in having a variety of housing. | Needham essentially has no more lots for single-family homes, so multifamily is the only way to add new housing. |
| Promotes income diversity/downsizing | Minimum compliance would provide a start. Test the waters before taking a plunge. | Important for Needham’s long-term health. Teachers, town employees and hospital staff will have a greater chance to live in town. Empty nesters will have more opportunity to sell single-family homes without leaving the community. Younger people will be able to have a toehold in Needham. | Rents/condos may be expensive, but less expensive than a single-family home. |
| Affects traffic and other infrastructure | Potential for slow traffic and more burdened water/sewage. | Infrastructure has been well studied and found highly manageable. | Studies and Needham history indicate concerns can be overblown. (E.g. North Hill, Greendale Avenue) |
| Affects schools | New students would add to already overcrowded schools, adding cost, compromising education and hurting property values. | School leadership is actively addressing overcrowding and long-term planning. | Projecting demographic trends long-term is difficult. |
| Leads to overdevelopment | Appetite for development is a slippery slope to more rezoning. | The approved plan inherently places limits on development, so no slippery slope. | Any expansion into residential areas would require new zoning. |
| Affects town’s look and feel | Large buildings will change the character of the town. | Change will improve Needham. Expansive zoning will only marginally change building design vs. minimally compliant zoning. | Comparable towns have more vibrant business areas and more foot traffic than Needham. Downtown improvement groups have concluded that Needham’s existing commercial buildings have limited curb appeal. |
| Affects commercial properties/businesses | Commercial property could be replaced by housing, reducing retail and office space. | Win for local businesses thanks to residential proximity and walkability. Mixed use is a particular positive. Needham merchants, residents and officials have long hoped for a more vibrant town center and retail environment. | While some businesses may be displaced, others may benefit from a more vibrant town center and retail environment. Development will have to be managed. |
| Neighborhood plan would have significant impact | Needham could become urbanized. | Based on expert analysis, more expansive zoning simply increases the possibility that any multifamily housing will be built in the zone. | Maximum buildout is unlikely due to the lot consolidation it would require and the economics of the existing properties. |
Save as PDF